The Offences Against the Person Act 1861 is one hundred and fifty years old today, 6th of August 2011. The Act is very much alive and well, although much of the Act has been repealed it is still one of the cornerstones of our criminal laws that protect us from assault, wounding and harm.
The basis of all medical treatment is that there should be a disease or injury that needs treatment and that the patient should personally consent to such treatment.
There are of course exceptions (see the post Consent and circumcision) but informed personal consent becomes crucial when the treatment being sought is non-therapeutic. If a doctor treats a patient who has no disease or injury and cannot personally consent to such treatment then the doctor has no defence of reasonable surgery and is probably committing a crime under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
It would appear to folow that the non-therapeutic circumcision of boys who are healthy and, being minors, cannot personally consent to a non-therapeutic procedure, is a crime. It is quite surprising that no prosecutions have been brought to date.
New to MDC?
Sign up for free newsletter
- RT @RozeQuartz: Brother K protesting in the streets of Downtown Los Angeles 27 Feb. #i2 #circumcision #protest #America #humanrights http:/… 09:20:09 AM March 09, 2014 ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @TheWHOLENetwork: Two leaders of the youth division of the Dutch ruling party called for a ban on non-medical circumcision of boys.... h… 09:17:59 AM March 09, 2014 ReplyRetweetFavorite
- The UK law on male circumcision examined http://t.co/rhDfEFfVS1 03:07:32 PM March 08, 2014 ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Healing Men on Council of Europe hearing on male circumcision
- Cees van der Duin on Historic event in Denmark; report by Morten Frisch
- Till Benz on Council of Europe hearing on male circumcision
- Patrick Smyth on Council of Europe hearing on male circumcision
- Cees van der Duin on Student nurse wins ethics award